Showing posts with label breastmilk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label breastmilk. Show all posts

Sunday 13 July 2008

Normalizing Breastfeeding: Ignore the Guilt, Feed the Baby

Confronted daily with ancient, ignorant and silly suppositions about the function and purpose of human breasts, I'd like to take a few moments to offer some basic facts.

Breasts are glands.

That means that they are not, say, fence posts or buckets, nor even bladders. 

Do many people know what glands do? Here's a simple overview: through interaction with the blood system, glands absorb blood components and create enzymes and hormones and a variety of complex fluids and then excrete what is created. We have salivary glands, men have seminal glands, we all have adrenal glands. They excrete things: saliva, semen, adrenaline... or, in the case of mammary glands: milk.

When you think of eating, do you say to yourself 'better wait for my salivary glands to fill up, so I'll be able to chew and swallow....' Hardly. Glands don't 'fill up' they 'produce.' So, just for real, blatant clarity: breasts produce milk, they don't store it.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/photofarmer/14117597485/in/photolist-nvwnTc-8vGnwi-JoBnsw-pGPryv-r86XQF-ehaVyE-8yWpRF-n1zprF-fyZYBX-hWF2n5-euYyqj-3GqCC-3ckeF3-2V3SPR-5YUXw3-nrScxt-bYfGW5-bCfaPZ-a6jJwq-7id6dE-9Rn3hz-r2VvpL-hCJz5H-vGaTR-8edQtM-8yZuYY-a3RQv2-8yZvc1-7FCUJ9-7f5fZz-HEAHp-euVqXn-8yWpYv-8yZwiQ-8yZvSf-ecsGfu-fDu2BN-9w8wiR-rYESWh-a2fagn-fErmVw-b6KTAe-ric5mj-b6KQ4M-5mmYdU-cpPtXN-7vMUS-5HiVyP-9uM78c-ho9jeK
Since they don't 'fill up' it is also not possible for them to 'empty.' If one more healthcare professional says 'empty the breast' within 100 yards of me, I am going to scream. What century, do you think it was, when it was 'discovered' that breasts were glands? Who, out of a random sample of professions that includes lawyers, research librarians, potters and physicians, do you think should know that?

https://www.flickr.com/photos/imagesbywestfall/5093910979/in/photolist-8L8Cgn-6eTCvv-4444aY-LnUvV-4KK6j-4GLFmt-7VhVHw-pRyagD-asRRg-9U8g2-eqNAAK-8ou6RL-jQU4G-6bUyQ8-7H3FpF-z7GoG-rxBDrd-nqYEzy-9w8ZN1-FAfww-ri6Kw-gEJXNs-dSVzKX-oNh1gK-8hWVbn-mt2m-8RRcuU-6HkPkx-oyxYNQ-RVEnRa-7H7BjE-7TAsj7-48uquQ-w6S8G5-5Cyxgq-5XZiZe-vFUtU-bJBVCc-EYroqW-7Est9V-8yizY-4Fn9Mb-4jsyrT-aHWoLi-4Q2iA9-4raxU1-4pZwBD-AH9jFo-5pn1pd-7vGi6hLike pineal glands and pituitary glands and sweat glands, mammary glands don't have an expiry date. That means that whenever those glands are triggered to start doing what it is that they do, they don't magically stop being able to do so at some arbitrary point in time. So, cue the screaming: the next time I hear a healthcare professional tell anyone that after X years or months mothers can no longer make 'good' milk, I'm just going to go completely banshee.

The changes that occur in breasts during pregnancy alter the function of the breast forever. From being a cute way to fill out a bra they become functioning glands. They do not revert to non-functioning glands, although their production without the necessary stimulation will reduce to virtually nil. So, whether or not this mommy is currently making any milk for anyone doesn't stop the gland from being fully capable of functioning at any time. It may take a while for the necessary stimulation to create a significant supply again, but demand (or the lack of it) is the only reason for the supply to diminish. Women who are decades post-menopause can continue to lactate.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/g-dzilla/3947667182/in/photolist-6SWbFX-iCiRUh-2T2cb5-iLSZk5-6wEWuH-nWgSy-gbSTrU-7KxNoC-gbSGHY-qQA9RY-nWgMg-3hSU6W-5sxgzb-5sxeFW-5tK1M9-5tJZu1-oQkZdV-5tJZ5E-71QPVh-7FnASs-bkwAYx-de3FpY-4LTrPj-7AVY2A-de3FbW-nWgyz-nWgrB-6CuEAx-5tXkMb-nWgG8-dYr23q-8fyhDt-FBPY4-7FGuxQ-7Ed4qs-FBPYZ-FBPYK-FBPYe-nmKtJU-5SqRDu-7HiNDt-CiU1-64baZf-ampJD7-nhu1mk-xLbdaj-ob8Gij-aEPccHWhich brings me to the next one: 'lost my milk'. Grrr. Shall I just scream now and save myself the suspense in waiting?

It is not possible to 'lose' milk. Well, after you've expressed it into something, you can certainly lose track of it... but 'I couldn't make any milk' is so incredibly rare a physical condition to be statistically-irrelevant for this diatribe. No matter what makes anyone feel less guilty about their choices, sorry to say.
[At this juncture I will just interrupt myself to point out that I happen to know there are a great many vile and unhealthy choices that rival even artificial breastmilk formula in terms of damage to baby's health and potential for loss of life that a great many children have survived being fed in infancy. I know that for many women breastfeeding is a tremendous struggle and for many more it is just about the most gross and disgusting thing they can think of doing with their bodies (which makes me wonder how they felt about the process of getting pregnant.... but, hey! whatever!). But, honestly, it would be so much less obnoxious if they just said 'I just didn't want to,' instead of repeating all the physically-impossible fantasies about how they 'couldn't.' If they can't deal with how guilty they feel about not wanting to (or about caving into the pressure not to, or by being ignorant enough of the facts to be convinced by someone that it was impossible, or didn't matter much anyhow), I am certainly not going to go to any trouble to cover up the accurate information -- first because it won't help them and, second because lying to another woman certainly won't make anyone's else's guilt go away, either. Get therapy, and leave the breastfeeding advocates out of it, k?]

So... 'losing' milk. Losing what is necessary to maintain a milk supply is closer to the truth. 

Just as no one measures the amount of saliva output when they're not eating (and then fret about how little saliva they make, oh my!) the measure of 'enough' breastmilk is based solely on the baby having unlimited access to the breast and being well-positioned to be able to do the job. 

Yes, I did say 'unlimited'. 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/50066720@N03/5836914190/in/photolist-9TMHey-cev6eY-3kBsr-6y88DK-27Uggx-4SroPg-cVTVeQ-6ZyTaD-7SD4GK-gvhs77-6HieDM-ncBYPw-qj4kzg-bSSkv4-cZ5rhU-ojtgGo-8Kwttr-rxP2JK-NLmTu-6NasAc-bjFevt-9tdPnj-pD4oi3-85fzGt-9TFHKF-a2HtGK-iGoGM-pDvtvs-9Ve9Gn-dttKLz-4DxT81-5uXxLL-bVacCi-6yq69U-4Yr2WW-fgsR6P-5vkVFY-bxNWoE-93Mfsd-dkBvGj-6yq69w-37iZdB-9PJbTH-7Bfjta-bUCEiZ-mA8wb-mA8y5-aHGMi-6yq6ah-arWPw8
Breasts need babies around to stimulate an appropriate milk supply (oh, what a surprise), and babies need breasts around to grow naturally and normally. Isn't it fortunate how breasts and babies tend to come all of a piece... 

When mom decides that baby can be 'over there' (in another room or city), she is gambling on her body's ability to respond to stimulus that is not present. Lots of women have those kind of breasts: make buckets of milk at the drop of a pin, pretty much no matter what is going on around them. 

Other women are less fortunate (and have drier clothes): they need the baby right there, hormones and all, for their bodies to respond to the stimuli necessary. Including [is everyone ready to shudder and shriek?] licking, bumping against and mouthing without sucking 'purposefully'.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_the_seeker/15185003806/in/photolist-p8R7As
Yes, that means that a baby with unlimited access to the breast is not going to be nursing 'down to business' 100% of the time. Restricted from the rest of the natural behaviours that increase milk supply, this mom is going to have a great deal of difficulty making her body do what would otherwise be natural. Pump or no pump. Period. No matter how uncomfortable it makes anyone else.

Breastfeeding, lactation and the function of the human breast are biological processes. 

Pretending that the social 'norms' or cultural discomforts are important is naive to say the least. Cultural lies actively impede healthy breastfeeding.

Friday 20 June 2008

Tell me what breastmilk really is, please

https://www.flickr.com/photos/trendscout/5489543239/in/photolist-zpp4Sy-7Goaeq-b74FUP-9n6kXe-b74Edv-9QWkFb-pmjLAV-zqrT6p-zqrSS8-7WDxUe-eboyt4-7KKSA2-aquqnc-b74BNV-7JDpG3-km2qdt-km2prt-7UT6DB-bomex8-b74Cx4-7SLaZX-z8WX3a-7UDq5L-HUvd2m-7Wrp62-75BcuX-7Ue8em-a9xmw-7Vn1f1-aquqWM-b74BBX-6oQLRg-aqx7pL-7WDy6V-7VdeEP-eaZfSL-7Wrpt4-7WDxJa-aCpjG1-KgRmgV-adBx5a-aCp9MY-aquoGg-J1mqV9-djidq8-7Mwx2W-J52Zg5-JTo24d-9zKWcv-bS9eCI frequently field questions like:
  • when do I start feeding my baby real food?
  • she isn't eating very much real food, what should I do?
  • how much real food should my baby be getting?
My policy has long been to answer every question with a question... What I'd like to ask is:


What on earth have you been feeding the baby so far? Spackle?

I am familiar with the popular cultural idea that babies aren't really people, so I suppose it makes some deranged sense that the food made specifically for them (by a human body) probably can't be real either. 

I mean, truly, babyhood is just a transition period from non-existent to potential humanness (which happens on a sliding scale, generally just a bit older than the child currently is), so obviously anything that happens in that period is, by definition, not really happening. 

 At least not to a real person. 

They won't remember it anyhow, which is somehow justification for behaving as if their feelings or experiences aren't real. Hmm... back to that real thing, already.

Breastmilk (and all the commercial products made to look or ...um, no, just look... vaguely like it when viewed from a great distance in a dim light) probably, by natural extension of the thought-process involved, would automatically not really be real or worth anything either.

But, people: what is milk, if it isn't food? 

https://www.flickr.com/photos/79457539@N00/4727939291/in/photolist-8cMVCF-9sBMpC-djJ5L9-7GR5bt-6sKJ5D-5XTZGB-7KmvF2-3sTpR1-4yD7d-4uSFpg-4yD6p-2SBwt-4yCPrM-7L54tZ-PegjC-98SJ8e-81osEJ-6LMBKN-6HUokg-5yShgU-5eXuag-fzU3JG-ctmZy-8FqrQC-751uxZ-9YPaih-8tfxVX-5EJ2QR-qPkEca-S8Y6qS-4EPusP-6PfPjj-FMJ9A-dwrSsC-9kWUDd-S2jXr4-6VhhxJ-ii4rKD-7hKwy-5z5cTb-81khtp-6sPQWC-7p8yhs-7p8ytE-6GcwmN-2NfsXy-491fTA-dDuw4u-iU1rA-7p4GGTWhat is the baby growing on, thriving on... surviving on, if it's not food? What possible other category could it go into? Here is a selection of options:
  • transportation methods
  • building materials
  • ideas
  • furniture
  • pets
  • genre fiction
  • sport
Life is filled with all kinds of spectacular mental gymnastics. The maneuver that puts breastmilk (or its artificial substitutes) into a category with wishful thinking and the tooth fairy is very odd to see in action.

So, to clarify: breastmilk is the ideal human food. In a healthy mother, there are no nutritional deficits (no nutrient required by a human body that is not supplied by milk) and the only reason we move on to a wider variety of food is... okay, there're 2 reasons:
  1. eventually mom would have to eat more than her bodyweight in food to satisfy the children's caloric needs, and;
  2. it would become a closed system with energy used up and not supplied from anywhere else which, until people can do photosynthesis, can't succeed.
It's food. 

It's real. 

Clear?